For residents' committees, associations and community groups

Your residents report. You prove it.

Odour.Live centralises your residents' reports, qualifies them according to the frameworks used by environmental agencies, and gives you analyses and reports ready to send to the operator, the town hall and the environmental authorities (in France, the DREAL).

Free. No consultant. No middleman.

“My indicators” dashboard, Odour.Live
List of reports in the airshed, Odour.Live mobile app

Free

No licence, no subscription, no quote. For committees, associations, local authorities and journalists.

Zero data entry

No more e-mails to sort, forms to copy out or spreadsheets to update on Sunday evenings.

Real-time analyses

Each report appears immediately and updates your statistics and exportable reports (PDF, XLSX).

Tamper-proof data

No operator, no local authority and no third party can delete, modify, hide or delay a report. Only its author, if they have an account, can request its withdrawal.

International standards

FIDOL, VDI 3882, standardised odour typology, time-stamping and georeferencing.

The problem

A spreadsheet is not a case file.

Most groups already collect reports: by e-mail, by messaging app, by online form. The problem is not getting residents involved: it's what is left of it when you need to convince.

E-mails and messages to sort, copy out and chase up
A single form, filled in by the resident in under a minute
Free-text descriptions that can't be compared: “it stank last night”
Intensity on a standardised scale and an odour type chosen from a list
“Near the bridge, the other evening”
Time-stamped to the minute and georeferenced point of perception
Hours spent cross-checking your reports with weather records, when you manage to
Wind, gusts and temperature recorded automatically with each report: the cross-check is already done
A file that only you know how to read
Maps, curves and wind correlations generated automatically
Evenings spent formatting before every meeting
An up-to-date PDF report, in one click
An analysis outsourced, invoiced and delivered three months later
Built-in analyses, always available
A history that gets lost when a volunteer steps down
A history that grows stronger with every report

The same effort asked of residents. A result that stands up in front of an inspector.

Efficiency

From the nuisance felt to a document that becomes the reference

Four fully automated steps. Nothing to enter, nothing to reprocess, nothing to format.

1

Collect< 1 min per report

The resident opens the group's link and describes the odour in a few taps: intensity, type, duration, nuisance felt. The time, position and weather conditions at that moment are recorded automatically: wind direction and strength, gusts, temperature. No mandatory account, no cookie, no personal data required.

No report gets lost any more, and none depends on your availability.

2

Qualifyinstant

Each report is structured according to the five FIDOL factors, intensity on the VDI 3882 scale, a typology based on odour wheels, time-stamping and location. It stops being a testimony: it becomes comparable data.

Two reports from two different people can be added together.

3

Aggregatereal time

Reports are cross-referenced: by hour, by day, by geographical sector, by odour type, by wind direction. Recurrences appear, episodes take shape, the most exposed areas stand out on the map.

You go from “people are complaining” to “214 reports, 68% of them between 8 pm and midnight, concentrated to the north-east of the site, with a south-westerly wind”.

4

Report1 click

A full PDF report for the period of your choice, anonymised CSV / XLSX export, exportable maps and charts. Ready to attach to a letter, a formal complaint, a site monitoring committee or a press file.

Your case is ready before the meeting, not three weeks after.

Independence

Your data depends on no one.

An odour monitoring scheme is rarely neutral: it is frequently funded, framed or operated by the party being questioned, or by a body it belongs to. This is not a question of competence: it is a question of position. On Odour.Live, collection, analysis and reporting belong to the group that produces them.

Your data is never negotiable

No operator, no local authority and no third party can delete, modify, hide or delay a report. Only its author, if they have an account, can request its withdrawal — no paid option will ever allow otherwise.

No dependence on a consultancy

The analyses usually invoiced are built in and permanent.

No gatekeeper

View, export and publish your data freely: reports, maps, indicators, including to the operator, the prefect, the press and your members. Only transferring the raw dataset to a third party for reuse requires our agreement.

No black box

The frameworks used and the calculation methods are explicit and documented on the Method page.

Our business model, frankly

Operators can access the platform, and that access may be charged to them. It is charged to them; it is never charged to a group, an association, a local authority, a journalist or a resident. What an operator buys is the tool: visualisation, alerts, analysis. It buys no information that you don't already have.

It sees neither more data, nor more precise data, nor sooner than you. Any feature opened to an operator in your area is open to you free of charge. And paying gives no rights over the content: it cannot delete, modify, hide or delay a report, nor challenge it before publication.

What your group produces and shares, reports, maps, indicators, is free to use, including towards the operator, the prefecture, the press and residents; only the transfer of the raw dataset to a third party for reuse is regulated.

The aim of the platform is to better equip citizens and make them independent of the operator: a single, shared and transparent source of truth.

Air quality monitoring associations (AASQA in France), laboratories and consultancies keep their full role: standardised measurements, olfactometry, dispersion studies. Odour.Live documents something else: what residents actually perceive, continuously and over time, which no one-off campaign can capture. The two approaches complement each other.

Method

Each report is built as data, not as a complaint.

The frameworks used are those of environmental agencies and odour standardisation. That is what makes the difference between a file of grievances and a defensible case.

FIDOL factors

Frequency, intensity, duration, offensiveness, location. The grid used by environmental authorities to qualify an odour nuisance.

VDI 3882 scales

Intensity and hedonic tone on standardised scales: your year-on-year comparisons hold up.

Weather recorded at source

Wind, gusts and temperature at the time of the report. Not reconstructed afterwards, so hard to challenge.

No file of complainants

Anonymous reports, degraded position, no cookies. You get the information without creating a sensitive data processing operation.

The details, on a separate page.

The detailed frameworks, sources, scales and acknowledged limits of the platform are set out there in full. It is also the page your contacts will consult to check.

Read the full method

Analyses

The analyses you are usually charged for. Included.

They are recalculated with every new report.

Nothing to order, nothing to wait for, nothing to pay.

Here are a few examples: many other charts are available and directly accessible on the platform.

Wind rose and weather conditions

Wind rose

Wind rose and weather conditions

Weather conditions are recorded with each report, not reconstructed afterwards. This allows correlation with the wind (direction, strength), temperature, humidity, ...

The hardest argument to challenge: reports are concentrated when the wind blows from the site.

Time cross-analysis of reports

Time cross-analysis

Time cross-analysis of reports

Reports (number, intensity) displayed by hour, day of the week or month: a way to better identify cycles and probable causes.

Odours do not occur at random: they follow the rhythm of operations.

Trend and average intensity

Time series

Trend and average intensity

Number of reports and average intensity, hour by hour, day by day or month by month...

How long the phenomenon lasts, and the real effect of announced measures.

Odour typology and intensity

Typology

Odour typology and intensity

Share of each odour type in the reports, with details by type and sub-type available.

A dominant odour signature, pointing to a specific process.

Many other analyses are available on the platform: analysis of comments and free-text fields, word cloud, average daily profile, correlation with temperature, daily trend by odour type, ...

A consultancy charges several thousand euros for this level of analysis and delivers it once. Here, it updates itself.

Real time

You see what is happening while it happens.

A live dashboard

Each report appears immediately on the map and in the statistics.

Episodes spotted on the spot

When reports pile up over a few hours, the episode is visible straight away.

Responsiveness

Alert the operator, the town hall or the inspectorate during the episode, not three weeks later.

Permanent visibility for your members

They see their reports count. That is where trust in the group is built.

Reporting

A case file ready to send, in one click.

Automatic PDF reportPeriod of your choice. Figures summary, maps, charts, table of episodes, methodology and frameworks cited in the appendix. Written to be attached as is to a letter or a formal complaint.
XLSX / CSV exportAll the raw data, anonymised: date, time, intensity, typology, duration, blurred coordinates. Verifiable by a court expert, a journalist or the prefecture.

A case file that can be verified is a case file that is hard to dismiss.

Reports are kept for five years, then archived in anonymised and aggregated form, with no time limit: your historical series remain comparable.

Uses

What is it for, in practice?

Environmental authorities, prefecture

Attach a dated, located and methodologically sound history to a formal complaint. Document frequency, intensity and duration to support a request for an inspection, an additional order or a dispersion study.

Town hall, elected officials, site monitoring committee

Give the mayor concrete evidence to exercise his or her police powers or refer the matter to the prefecture. Arrive at the site monitoring committee with figures, maps and a method, not with impressions.

Operator

Provide time-stamped and georeferenced reports that make it possible to link a nuisance to a specific operation: loading, turning, maintenance, an air treatment shutdown. An operator acting in good faith has no better tool to target its actions.

Reporting is not accusing: it is providing the information that makes it possible to fix things.

Get started

Up and running in two days.

1

Create your group's space5 minutes

Group name, area concerned, site or installation monitored. Free, approval within 24 to 48 hours.

2

Share the link or a QR code for quick reportingkit provided

Share the reporting link in your Facebook and WhatsApp groups, by e-mail, ... Poster to print, visual for social media, ready-to-send message, insert for your newsletter. View and download the print-ready visuals to leave with the shops in your neighbourhood.

3

Let the history build up

View your analyses whenever you like, export when you need to: public meeting, letter, site monitoring committee, formal complaint.

How many reports are needed?

There is no regulatory threshold. What carries weight is regularity and repetition over time: a few dozen residents who report systematically, for months, are worth far more than hundreds of reports concentrated in a single week of mobilisation.

The questions groups ask

Create my group's space